Agriculture

Organic and GMO: let's talk about it

Organic and GMO: let's talk about it


We are searching data for your request:

Forums and discussions:
Manuals and reference books:
Data from registers:
Wait the end of the search in all databases.
Upon completion, a link will appear to access the found materials.

The theme of GMOs opposed tobiological agriculture makes people discuss, which is positive because when a problem (or an opportunity) arises, talking about it is better than pretending nothing has happened. The most difficult thing remains not to fall into evaluation errors due to the lack of information, or into preconceptions fueled by imperishable clichés. In short, it is an information problem, which must be tackled first of all by trying to understand.

An opportunity to try to understand was the conference Science in the Field last November, where experts from the university, the business and information world questioned how to feed the planet in the coming decades with good and healthy food, but also for everyone. Today we are 7 billion people on earth, in 2050 we will reach 9 billion: the problem arises. Science, innovation and technology (good, healthy and for everyone) are the only answer we have.

Provocative but effective the intervention during the conference of Antonio Pascale, agronomist and writer, star of Daria Bignardi's TV show The Barbarian Invasions: “GMOs are not monstrous products. We have been producing genetically modified plants for over 10,000 years, and this has allowed us throughout history to feed ourselves and eat healthier. The average yield of wheat has improved (from one ton / ha to 5-7 tons / ha) from the time of the pyramids to today, only in the 1900s: with herbicides, herbicides, fertilizers, and with genetic improvement. If we remove these innovations and go back to the so-called organic production is much lower ".

“Not to mention that organic doesn't free us from fatigue, organic needs a hoe - continued Pascale -. Let's not forget that in all cultures (in Africa still today, but also in Italy until a few decades ago) it was mainly women who spent most of their time hoeing. It is bad to forget the improvements made by our grandparents, it means not respecting the hunger they suffered and the efforts they made. The culture of the left is the bearer of this error above all, victim of a nostalgic knowledge, according to which all that is present is corrupt, all that comes from the past is good. But no one would apply this equation to medicine, for example: we all want to be treated in the most technologically advanced clinic. Why don't we think so when we talk about agriculture? "

What to say? Maybe it's worth investigating. This article is only a brief and inevitably partial introduction to a vast and articulated topic, a sort of invitation to read. The discussion is very open.



Video: Why Genetically Engineered Foods Should be Labeled: Gary Hirshberg at TEDxManhattan 2013 (July 2022).


Comments:

  1. Mozil

    Also that we would do without your brilliant phrase

  2. Fawzi

    This rather good idea is necessary just by the way

  3. Thom

    Perhaps, I agree with your opinion

  4. Aleeyah

    I will share one secret, it turns out that not everyone knows that you can promote your resource with articles? Come to me and see how other webmasters are already doing it. Write your article (you can take any post from this blog as a basis) with links and add it to my article directory. You have a link to the directory, I will not indicate it here again, because it makes no sense. Registration in catalogs is dying out, or at least losing ground, but the promotion of articles is gaining momentum.

  5. Vuzil

    This is a convention, no more, no less

  6. Mukree

    Shine

  7. Tariku

    In it something is. It is grateful to you for the help in this question. I did not know it.

  8. Kannon

    They are wrong. I am able to prove it. Write to me in PM, speak.



Write a message